Two types of leadership
In my experience, I have seen two main types of leadership: motivational and operational.
Motivational leaders inspire and paint broad pictures of vision of strategy. They have the ability to pass their energy to their employees, partners, friends, etc. They get energized by ideas and the possibility of what-if. For the most part, they ignore the details of execution and are dis-interested in the details of how things get done.
Operational leaders are the doers. They have the ability to put together a team, an organization, and the necessary process to achieve a vision. They usually are plain speakers who work behind the scenes. For the most part, they don’t question the vision but instead focus on achieving it. They are detailed oriented and are rarely worried about communicating a 3-year vision statement.
In college football, the head coach is usually the motivational leader getting players, fans, and alumni all pumped up. The offensive and defensive coordinators are the operational leaders calling plays that achieve the vision. In business, these roles are usually split between the CEO (motivational leader) and COO (operational leader).
The best organizations have both types of leadership. The most successful organizations not only have both types of leaders but also have motivational and operational leaders who have strong mutual respect for each other.
In most organizations one form of leadership is absent. When you don’t operational leadership, employees complain that the vision is out of touch with the products. When you don’t have motivational leadership, people complain that they don’t know why they are doing something.
The single biggest mistake of leadership is having one person try to do both. Leaders who know what they are good at will find someone who complements their style. Great motivational leaders who team with great operational leaders will build great organizations.
A good leader can do both, but in a company of sustantial size, this may be deligated to multiple people. Even good operational leaders must provide reasonable motivation or else silos quickly emerge.
As I commented on a blog post on leadership from Charles Zedlewski (http://www.mikelunt.com/blog/2006/11/04/links-for-2006-11-04/), it seems that there is a strong disconnect in the technical world about wanting and actually getting strong motivational leaders.
IMO, I don’t think it is something that can be delegated. While there may be great leaders who can indeed do both well, I maintain there are very few of these people.
I would agree any leader has to be able to do some of both. Still, I think most leaders will only be good at one. At least this is what i have observed…
I agree that both types are needed. Really any great team needs diverse kinds of people. A mix of your motivational and operational can make a strong company.
What really tends to happen is that one or the other surrounds themselves with the same kind of people causing a kind of group think. Thus, you have either way too much vision and no execution or lots of execution without much vision.